![]() For all these type of users 4K is typically a hindrance rather than an advantage. For me this camera is aimed at run and gun users, people making content strictly for the web and event shooters. ![]() Many people were disappointed that the C100 Mark II couldn’t do 4K either internally or externally. There seems to be a misconception out on the blogosphere that it essential for any new camera to be able to shoot 4K. But to me none of this matters given how and what I would use the camera for. It doesn’t have high frame rates or 4K recording. So why do I like the C100 Mark II? There has been a lot of criticism online that the C100 Mark II was not a substantial upgrade over the original C100. I use Sony cameras most of the time and was not a fan of the Canon C300. If you are a regular follower of Newsshooter this might come as a bit of a surprise. I’ll come straight out and say it – I like the C100 Mark II.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |